Engineering Disasters Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Engineering Disasters - Essay ExampleUndeniably, engineering knowhow so far has immensely contributed to humanitys wellorganism in diverse and numerous areas. This has enabled people to run their tasks with heightened efficiency, speed and even producing varied products meant to support humanitys survival. Some of these products include drugs, processed foodstuffs, vehicles and aircrafts. The Japanese Fukushima reactor meltdown relative incidence occurred due to manmade errors and inattention (Girard 342). This is contrary to numerous claims especially from the government citing that the whence coincidental earthquake exacerbated the incidence. According to the experts report, the government via its experts failed to utilize new and in effect(p) reactor designs. These could have ensured effective coolant regulation in the plant whose location was in a flood prone region. Hence, enable the thermonuclear plant to withstand the then severe earthquakes pressure. Besides, the requir ed designs would have prevented the subsequent Tsunamis force, which severed the Fukushimas power connections leading to the reactors overheating (Girard 342). Overheating led to the melting of reactors, which caused them to dispose their hot contents into the environment. This posed a hazard to both the inhabitants and other microorganisms in the region (Girard 342).Bostons Big Dig Ceiling Collapse incidence presents another example of a structural hardship (Harris, Pritchard & Rabins 235). The incidence occurred due to engineers negligence, whereas the local authorities failed to execute the necessary construction policies. According to the National expat Safety Board (NTSB) investigation report, Powers Fasteners Inc. knowingly supplied fast set epoxy resin instead of the standard adhesion (Harris, Pritchard & Rabins 235).... knowingly supplied fast set epoxy instead of the standard fastening (Harris, Pritchard & Rabins 235). Fast set epoxy is a ceiling fastener used for shor t-term structures, which engineers used at the site notwith rest being aware of the products creep and deformation nature (Harris, Pritchard & Rabins 235). Consequently, this inappropriate and erroneous use of materials prompted the 26 ton suspended ceiling concrete collapse onto a passing car and killing the driver (Harris, Pritchard & Rabins 235). Besides, in their report NTSB contend the sites contractors together with their engineers contributed to the structures collapsing. Since, they failed to utilize their make love and knowledge to unveil the fastening product type early in advance. Therefore, in this incidence despite the legal authorities claiming Powers Company played a significant role, sites engineers exhibited negligence and carelessness though not indicted by the law (Harris, Pritchard & Rabins 235). Engineers professional misconduct is also evident in the Hyatt Regency pass Collapse incidence that occurred on 17Th July 1981 (Whitbeck 173). The incidence led to t he demise of 114 people besides cc others sustaining grievous injuries. Before the incidences occurrence, people were in a tea party whereas others standing on the two walkways. The two connected walkways collapsed onto the credulous people who were busy enjoying themselves whereas others holding individual conversations (Whitbeck 173). This incidence to date marks the worst structural failure in the US history in equipment casualty of human life loss and injuries sustained (Whitbeck 173). The investigators of this incidence cited the