Critical Thinking - Model 3 - SLP - Deductive and Inductive Argumens Coursework

Critical thinking - Model 3 - SLP - Deductive and Inductive Argumens - Coursework Example172). As such, a premise must be able to support it remnant for it to be ascertained to be deductive. Additionally, the truth and acceptability of the conclusion weighs on the premise for any deductive argument to be valid.On the other hand, inductive argument is an inferential claim of probability that detaches conclusion to the premise. In essence, the truth or logical flow of the conclusion is exclusively independent of the premise (Lavery & Hughes, 2008, p. 172). Therefore, a premise can be true or acceptable plainly do not play any role in defining the truth and acceptability of the conclusion.In my view, deductive arguments have a direct and dependent conclusion on the premise. The truth and acceptability of the latter, therefore, depend of the premise. subsequently, the logical flow in inductive argument has no connection or certainty of conclusion with regards to premise.In conclusio n, the difference between inductive and deductive arguments lies on the ability of the premise to succinctly beg off its conclusion. Furthermore, the difference also prevails through acceptability and